Ground Reaction Forces and Kinematics in Distance Running in Older-Aged Men
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 35 (7), 1167-1175
- https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000074441.55707.d1
Abstract
Purpose: The biomechanics of distance running has not been studied before in older-aged runners but may be different than in younger-aged runners because of musculoskeletal degeneration at older age. This study aimed at determining whether the stance phase kinematics and ground reaction forces in running are different between younger- and older-aged men. Method: Lower-extremity kinematics using three-dimensional motion analysis and ground reaction forces (GRF) using a force plate were assessed in 16 older-aged (55-65 yr) and 13 younger-aged (20-35 yr) well-trained male distance runners running at a self-selected (SRS) and a controlled (CRS) speed of 3.3 m.s(-1). Results: The older subjects ran at significantly lower self-selected speeds than the younger subjects (mean 3.34 vs 3.77 m.s(-1)). In both speed conditions, the older runners exhibited significantly more knee flexion at heel strike and significantly less knee flexion and extension range of motion. No age group differences were present in subtalar joint motion. Impact peak force (1.91 vs 1.70 BW) and maximal initial loading rate (107.5 vs 85.5 BW.s(-1)) were significantly higher in the older runners at the CRS. Maximal peak vertical and anteroposterior forces and impulses were significantly lower in the older runners at the SRS. Conclusion: The biomechanics of running is different between older- and younger-aged runners on several relevant parameters. The larger impact peak force and initial loading rate indicate a loss of shock-absorbing capacity in the older runners. This may increase their susceptibility to lower-extremity overuse injuries. Moreover, it emphasizes the focus on optimizing cushioning properties in the design and prescription of running shoes and suggests that older-aged runners should be cautious with running under conditions of high impacThis publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of lower extremity overuse injury potential in runnersMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2000
- Comparison of the mechanical properties of the heel pad between young and elderly adultsArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1998
- Randomised controlled trial of effect of high-impact exercise on selected risk factors for osteoporotic fracturesThe Lancet, 1996
- Direct dynamics simulation of the impact phase in heel-toe runningJournal of Biomechanics, 1995
- Changes in Sprint Stride Kinematics with Age in Master’s AthletesJournal of Applied Biomechanics, 1993
- Stride length in distance runningMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1989
- The effect of varied stride rate upon shank deceleration in runningJournal of Sports Sciences, 1985
- The effect of stride length variation on oxygen uptake during distance runningMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1982
- Ground reaction forces in distance runningJournal of Biomechanics, 1980
- A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF ELITE AND GOOD DISTANCE RUNNERSAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1977