E-Government and Anti-Corruption: Empirical Analysis of International Data
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in International Journal of Public Administration
- Vol. 31 (3), 298-316
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701590553
Abstract
Case studies demonstrate that e-government is an effective tool to reduce corruption by promoting good governance and strengthening reform-oriented actors. Specifically, e-government can reduce corrupt behaviors externally by enhancing relationships with citizens and internally by more effectively controlling and monitoring employees' behaviors. This study examines the impact of e-government on corruption using national level data. The impacts of other traditional factors—bureaucratic professionalism, bureaucratic quality, and law enforcement—proposed by the public administration literature are also examined. Statistical analysis reveals that e-government has a consistently positive impact on reducing corruption, as do the traditional anti-corruption factors.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- E – Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and ChallengesThe Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 2004
- Electronic Government (E-Government) and DevelopmentThe European Journal of Development Research, 2004
- Determinants of Corruption: A Cross‐National AnalysisMultinational Business Review, 2003
- Corruption, Reform, and Virtue EthicsPublic Administration Review, 2003
- Cozy PoliticsPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2002
- Reinventing Local Governments and the E‐Government InitiativePublic Administration Review, 2002
- Corruption and GovernmentPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1999
- Wealth, Culture, and CorruptionJournal of International Business Studies, 1999
- The Sources of Ethical Decision Making for Individuals in the Public SectorPublic Administration Review, 1996
- Visions of Corruption Control and the Evolution of American Public AdministrationPublic Administration Review, 1994