The effects of visual apparency on bias in butterfly recording and monitoring
- 20 December 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Biological Conservation
- Vol. 128 (4), 486-492
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.015
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monitoring distributions using call surveys: estimating site occupancy, detection probabilities and inferring absenceBiological Conservation, 2005
- Ecological interpretation of changes in the dutch flora in the 20th centuryBiological Conservation, 2005
- Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groupsPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2005
- Butterfly habitats, broad‐scale biotope affiliations, and structural exploitation of vegetation at finer scales: the matrix revisitedEcological Entomology, 2004
- Assessing habitat quality for butterflies on intensively managed arable farmlandBiological Conservation, 2004
- Host plants and butterfly biology. Do host‐plant strategies drive butterfly status?Ecological Entomology, 2004
- Gains and losses of French butterflies: tests of predictions, under-recording and regional extinction from data in a new atlasBiological Conservation, 2003
- A comparison of geographical and neighbourhood models for improving atlas databases. The case of the French butterfly atlasBiological Conservation, 2002
- Truth or Consequences: Effects of Phylogenetic Accuracy on Two Comparative MethodsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1994
- Phylogenies and the Comparative MethodThe American Naturalist, 1985