Reevaluating the Implications of Recurrent Falls in Older Adults: Location Changes the Inference
- 27 January 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Vol. 60 (3), 517-524
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03834.x
Abstract
Objectives To compare characteristics of indoor and outdoor recurrent fallers and explore some implications for clinical practice, in which a fall risk assessment for all recurrent fallers has been recommended. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect, and Zest in the Elderly of Boston Study, a study of falls etiology in community‐dwelling older individuals from randomly sampled households in the Boston, Massachusetts, area. Participants Seven hundred thirteen women and men, mostly aged 70 and older, with at least 1 year of follow‐up. Measurements Data at baseline and from an 18‐month follow‐up examination were collected by questionnaire and comprehensive clinic examination. During follow‐up, participants recorded falls on daily calendars. A telephone interview queried location and circumstances of each fall. Results One hundred forty‐five participants reported recurrent falls (≥2) during the first year. Those who had fallen only outdoors had good health characteristics, whereas those who had fallen only indoors were generally in poor health. For instance, 25.5% of indoor‐only recurrent fallers had gait speeds of slower than 0.6 m/s, compared with 2.9% of outdoor‐only recurrent fallers; the respective percentages were 44.7% and 8.8% for Berg balance score less than 48. Recurrent indoor fallers generally had poor health characteristics regardless of their activity at the time of their falls, whereas recurrent outdoor fallers who fell during vigorous activity or walking were especially healthy. A report of any recurrent falls in the first year did not predict number of positive findings on a comprehensive or abbreviated fall risk assessment at the 18‐month follow‐up examination. Conclusion Characteristics of community‐dwelling older people with recurrent indoor and outdoor falls are different. If confirmed, these results suggest that different types of fall risk assessment are needed for specific categories of recurrent fallers.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Indoor and Outdoor Falls in Older Adults Are Different: The Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect, and Zest in the Elderly of Boston StudyJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2010
- Issues in Conducting Epidemiologic Research Among Elders: Lessons From The MOBILIZE Boston StudyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- The MOBILIZE Boston Study: Design and methods of a prospective cohort study of novel risk factors for falls in an older populationBMC Geriatrics, 2008
- Standardizing Assessment of Elderly People in Acute Care: The interRAI Acute Care InstrumentJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2008
- Outdoor falls among middle-aged and older adults: A neglected public health problemAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2006
- The self‐administered comorbidity questionnaire: A new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services researchArthritis Care & Research, 2003
- Drug data coding and analysis in epidemiologic studiesEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 1994
- Prevention of Falls among the ElderlyThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily LivingThe Gerontologist, 1969
- Studies of Illness in the AgedPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1963