No Study Left Behind: A Network Meta-Analysis in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Demonstrating the Importance of Considering All Relevant Data
- 1 September 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Value in Health
- Vol. 12 (6), 996-1003
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00541.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventionsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- Using indirect comparisons in pharmacoeconomic studies—Time for implementationClinical Therapeutics, 2007
- Utility of clinical trial results for clinical practiceEuropean journal of pain, 2007
- Indirect comparisons: the mesh and mess of clinical trialsThe Lancet, 2006
- Bayesian Methods for Evidence Synthesis in Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisPharmacoEconomics, 2006
- Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidenceBMJ, 2005
- Indirect comparisons of competing interventionsHealth Technology Assessment, 2005
- Adjusted indirect comparison of competing interventionsEvidence-based Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 1999