Faith and Protection: The Construction of Hope by Parents of Children with Leukemia and Their Oncologists
Open Access
- 27 February 2012
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Oncologist
- Vol. 17 (3), 398-404
- https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0308
Abstract
Background.: Oncologists are criticized for fostering unrealistic hope in patients and families, but criticisms reflect a perspective that is oversimplified and “expert” guidance that is ambiguous or impractical. Our aim was to understand how pediatric oncologists manage parents' hope in practice and to evaluate how they address parents' needs. Methods.: Participants were 53 parents and 12 oncologists whom they consulted across six U.K. centers. We audio recorded consultations approximately 1–2, 6, and 12 months after diagnosis. Parents were interviewed after each consultation to elicit their perspectives on the consultation and clinical relationship. Transcripts of consultations and interviews were analyzed qualitatively. Results.: Parents needed hope in order to function effectively in the face of despair, and all wanted the oncologists to help them be hopeful. Most parents focused hope on the short term. They therefore needed oncologists to be authoritative in taking responsibility for the child's long-term survival while cushioning parents from information about longer-term uncertainties and being positive in providing information about short-term progress. A few parents who could not fully trust their oncologist were unable to hope. Conclusion.: Oncologists' pivotal role in sustaining hope was one that parents gave them. Most parents' “faith” in the oncologist allowed them to set aside, rather than deny, their fears about survival while investing their hopes in short-term milestones. Oncologists' behavior generally matched parents' needs, contradicting common criticisms of oncologists. Nevertheless, oncologists need to identify and address the difficulty that some parents have in fully trusting the oncologist and, consequently, being hopeful.Keywords
Funding Information
- Cancer Research UK
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Patients Value When Oncologists Give News of Cancer Recurrence: Commentary on Specific Moments in Audio-Recorded ConversationsThe Oncologist, 2011
- ‘Admission into a helping plan’: a watershed between positive and negative experiences in breast cancerPsycho‐Oncology, 2010
- Physicians’ attitudes towards disclosure of prognostic information: A survey among a representative cross-section of 1605 Norwegian physiciansPatient Education and Counseling, 2009
- Dependence and caring in clinical communication: The relevance of attachment and other theoriesPatient Education and Counseling, 2009
- Communication About Prognosis Between Parents and Physicians of Children With Cancer: Parent Preferences and the Impact of Prognostic InformationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Assessing Communication Between Oncology Professionals and Their PatientsJournal of Cancer Education, 2005
- Doctors' communication of trust, care, and respect in breast cancer: qualitative studyBMJ, 2004
- The Discursive Properties of “Hope”: A Qualitative Analysis of Cancer Patients’ SpeechQualitative Health Research, 2002
- The creation of protection and hope in patients with malignant brain tumoursSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 1996
- Hope Work in the Care of Seriously Ill PatientsQualitative Health Research, 1991