Missing Data in Evaluation Research
- 1 December 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation & the Health Professions
- Vol. 9 (4), 395-420
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016327878600900401
Abstract
Although research conducted in applied settings is frequently hindered by missing data, there is surprisingly little practical advice concerning effective methods for dealing with the problem. The purpose of this article is to describe several alternative methodsfor dealing with incomplete multivariate data and to examine the effectiveness of these methods. It is concluded that pairwise deletion and listwise deletion are among the least effective methods in terms of approximating the results that would have been obtained had the data been complete, whereas replacing missing values with estimates based on correlationalprocedures generally produces the most accurate results. In addition, some descriptive statistical procedures are recommended that permit researchers to investigate the causes and consequences of incomplete data more fully.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Deterministic Theory of Clinical Performance RatingEvaluation & the Health Professions, 1984
- Ubiquitous halo.Psychological Bulletin, 1981
- Alternative Approaches to Missing Values in Discriminant AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1976
- A proposal for handling missing dataPsychometrika, 1975
- The estimation of variance-covariance and correlation matrices from incomplete dataPsychometrika, 1970
- The missing data matrixJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1968
- Comparison of Three Methods of Handling Missing ObservationsPsychological Reports, 1968
- Linear Regression Analysis with Missing Observations among the Independent VariablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1964
- Moments and Distributions of Estimates of Population Parameters from Fragmentary SamplesThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1932