Use of a Computerized Guideline for Glucose Regulation in the Intensive Care Unit Improved Both Guideline Adherence and Glucose Regulation
Open Access
- 23 November 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 12 (2), 172-180
- https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.m1598
Abstract
Objective: To measure the impact of a computerized guideline for glucose regulation in an ICU. Design: A randomized, controlled trial with an off-on-off design. Methods: We implemented a glucose regulation guideline in an intensive care unit in paper form during the first study period. During the second period, the guideline was randomly applied in either paper or computerized form. In the third period, the guideline was available only in paper form. Measurements and results: We analyzed data for 484 patients. During the intervention period, the control group included 54 patients and the computerized intervention group included 66 patients. The two guideline-related outcome measures consisted of compliance with: (a) glucose measurement timing recommendations and (b) insulin dose advice. We measured clinical impact as the proportion of time that glucose levels fell within target range. In the first (paper-based) study period, 29.0% of samples occurred with optimal timing; during the second period, this increased to 35.5% for paper-based and to 40.2% for computerized protocols. The third study period timeliness scores reverted to the first period rates. Late (suboptimal) sampling occurred for 66% of glucose measurements in the first study period, for 42% of paper-based and 28% of computer-based protocol samples in the second period, and for 50.0% of samples in the third study period. In the first study period, insulin-dosing guideline compliance was 56.3%; in the second period, it was 64.2% for paper-based and 77.3% for computer-based protocols, and it fell to 42.4% in the third period. For the second study period, the time that a patient's glucose values fell within target range improved for both the control (52.9%) and the computerized groups (54.2%) compared with the first study period (44.3%) and the third period (42.3%). Conclusion: Implementing a computerized version of a guideline significantly improved timeliness of measurements and glucose level regulation for critically ill patients compared with implementing a paper-based version of the guideline.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Automating Complex Guidelines for Chronic Disease: Lessons LearnedJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2003
- Adherence to practice guidelines: The role of specialty society guidelinesAmerican Heart Journal, 2003
- Physician adherence to clinical practice guidelines: Does it really matter?American Heart Journal, 2003
- Implementation of clinical guidelines through an electronic medical record: physician usage, satisfaction and assessmentInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2001
- Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?Jama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1999
- Online Practice Guidelines: Issues, Obstacles, and Future ProspectsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1998
- Clinical Practice Guidelines on Depression: Awareness, Attitudes, and Content Knowledge Among Family Physicians in New YorkArchives of Family Medicine, 1998
- Computerizing Guidelines to Improve Care and Patient Outcomes: The Example of Heart FailureJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1995
- Stress hormone and blood glucose response following acute stroke in the elderly.Stroke, 1991
- Blood Glucose Area Under the Curve: Methodological AspectsDiabetes Care, 1990