The Measurement of Quality of Care in the Veterans Health Administration
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Medical Care
- Vol. 34 (Supplement), 55-68
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199603001-00006
Abstract
The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is committed to continual refinement of its system of quality measurement. The VHA organizational structure for quality measurement has three levels. At the national level, the Associate Chief Medical Director for Quality Management provides leadership, sets policy, furnishes measurement tools, develops and distributes measures of quality, and delivers educational programs. At the intermediate level, VHA has four regional offices with staff responsible for reviewing risk management data, investigating quality problems, and ensuring compliance with accreditation requirements. At the hospital level, staff reporting directly to the chief of staff or the hospital director are responsible for implementing VHA quality management policy. The Veterans Health Administration's philosophy of quality measurement recognizes the agency's moral imperative to provide America's veterans with care that meets accepted standards. Because the repair of faulty systems is more efficient than the identification of poor performers, VHA has integrated the techniques of total quality into a multifaceted improvement program that also includes the accreditation program and traditional quality assurance activities. VHA monitors its performance by maintaining adverse incident databases, conducting patient satisfaction surveys, contracting for external peer review of 50,000 records per year, and comparing process and outcome rates internally and when possible with external benchmarks. The near-term objectives of VHA include providing medical centers with a quality matrix that will permit local development of quality indicators, construction of a report card for VHA's customers, and implementing the Malcolm W. Baldrige system for quality improvement as the road map for systemwide continuous improvement. Other goals include providing greater access to data, creating a patient-centered database, providing real-time clinical decision support, and expanding the databases.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors predictive of operative mortality among coronary artery bypass subsetsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1993
- A Framework for the Continual Improvement of Health Care: Building and Applying Professional and Improvement Knowledge to Test Changes in Daily WorkThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 1993
- Functional Assessment in Rehabilitation MedicinePhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 1993
- Integrating Total Quality Management and Quality Assurance at the University of Michigan Medical CenterQRB - Quality Review Bulletin, 1992
- Continuous quality improvement. Concepts and applications for physician careJAMA, 1991
- Initial report of the veterans administration preoperative risk assessment study for cardiac surgeryThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1990
- The case for using industrial quality management science in health care organizationsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1989
- Continuous Improvement as an Ideal in Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Involving Consumers in Quality of Care AssessmentHealth Affairs, 1988
- Studies of Illness in the AgedJAMA, 1963