A new perspective on the incentive–blood donation relationship: partnership, congruency, and affirmation of competence
- 10 February 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Transfusion
- Vol. 52 (9), 1889-1900
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03545.x
Abstract
The Motivation Crowding-out Theory suggests that incentives undermine intrinsic motivation and thus blood donation behavior. While there is strong evidence showing the negative relationship between monetary incentives and blood donation, findings on the effect of nonmonetary incentives are mixed. Set in a voluntary, nonremunerated environment, this study explores aspects of the nonmonetary incentive-blood donation relationship not captured by the crowding-out hypothesis. In-depth interviews were conducted to explore donors' attitudes toward nonmonetary incentives currently used or considered by the Australian Red Cross Blood Service (Blood Service). Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive, thematic approach. Of the nonmonetary incentives examined (i.e., health screening tests, branded tokens, paid time off work, recognition of key milestones, and postdonation refreshments), none were found to crowd out intrinsic motivation, although not all were viewed favorably. Donors who viewed branded tokens negatively considered the cost implications for the Blood Service, while donors who responded positively considered the public benefit of tokens in raising the profile of the Blood Service. Other nonmonetary incentives-paid time off work, postdonation refreshments, and health screening tests-were viewed positively because donors perceived them to be congruent to the effort expended in donating blood. Finally, donors expressed a preference for private over public recognition when acknowledging significant contributions. When operating in a voluntary, nonremunerated environment, blood services should view donors as supply partners rather than customers, only consider nonmonetary incentives that are congruent with the act of donation, and provide private rather than public recognition of key milestones.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Crowding Out Intrinsic Motivation in the Public SectorJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2010
- Do all material incentives for pro-social activities backfire? The response to cash and non-cash incentives for blood donationsJournal of Economic Psychology, 2010
- Blood donor incentives: A step forward or backwardAsian Journal of Transfusion Science, 2010
- Free cholesterol testing as a motivation device in blood donations: evidence from field experimentsTransfusion, 2009
- Crowding Out in Blood Donation: Was Titmuss Right?Journal of the European Economic Association, 2008
- Blood collection and transfusion in the United States in 2001Transfusion, 2007
- Why did you do that? An economic examination of the effect of extrinsic compensation on intrinsic motivation and performanceJournal of Economic Psychology, 2005
- Comparative analysis of national regulations concerning blood safety across EuropeTransfusion Medicine, 2004
- Where have all the donors gone? A personal reflection on the crisis in America's volunteer blood programTransfusion, 2003
- Attitudes toward blood donation incentives in the United States: implications for donor recruitmentTransfusion, 2003