Analysis of remote trauma transfers in South Central Texas with comparison with current US combat operations
- 1 August 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
- Vol. 75 (2), S164-S168
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e31829be079
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze demographic, epidemiologic, temporal, and outcome data from an integrated trauma registry of patients undergoing initial stabilization and transfer within a mature domestic trauma network; compare data with a companion subset from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry. Texas Trauma Service Area-P is composed of 25 counties, 15 rural Level IV trauma centers (no acute care surgery), and two Level I trauma centers. This study has a retrospective cohort design. We hypothesize that Injury Severity Scores (ISSs), time intervals, and other clinical indicators would be complimentary to contemporary combat casualties. Inclusion criteria include age 18 years to 80 years, transferred from Level IV to Level I trauma center, or expired en route. A total of 543 subjects (84%) met the criteria and were analyzed. Averages and confidence intervals were as follows: age of 40 years (38-41 years), males at 81%, ISS of 10 (10-11), intensive care unit stay of 2 days (1-3 days), and hospital stay of 5 days (4-6 days). Mechanisms of injury were as follows: penetrating (15%), blunt weapon (19%), stabs (9%), burns (5%), and gunshots (5%). Eight percent received blood within the first 24 hours. Survival was at 98%. Time intervals (95% confidence interval) were as follows: prehospital at 1:43 (1:29-1:58), Level IV dwell time at 3:17 (3:06-3:28), interfacility transfer at 1:43 (1:36-1:49), and total at 6:39 (6:20-6:58). RemTORN cases were older, spent longer time en route to Level I, and had ISS similar to combat casualties. Rates of blood transfusion in the first 24 hours and survival were similar in order of magnitude. The RemTORN platform is operational. Demographic, epidemiologic, and temporal characteristics as observed will support clinical investigations of traumatic coagulopathy, shock, and potential interventions before Level I arrival. Results of such investigations will likely be applicable to the contemporary and future battlefield.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Remote damage control resuscitation and the Solstrand Conference: defining the need, the language, and a way forwardTransfusion, 2013
- Prehospital interventions performed in a combat zoneThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2012
- Died of Wounds on the Battlefield: Causation and Implications for Improving Combat Casualty CareThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2011
- Analysis of Life-Saving Interventions Performed by Out-of-Hospital Combat Medical PersonnelThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2011
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Administering Tranexamic Acid to Bleeding Trauma Patients Using Evidence from the CRASH-2 TrialPLOS ONE, 2011
- Impact of joint theater trauma system initiatives on battlefield injury outcomesThe American Journal of Surgery, 2009
- Out-of-Hospital Combat Casualty Care in the Current War in IraqAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2009
- Does increased emergency medical services prehospital time affect patient mortality in rural motor vehicle crashes? A statewide analysisThe American Journal of Surgery, 2009
- Study of the Outcome of Patients Transferred to a Level I Hospital after Stabilization at an Outlying Hospital in a Rural SettingThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1999
- Prehospital Advanced Life Support for Major Trauma: Critical Need for Clinical TrialsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1998