Intraguild Predation Usually does not Disrupt Biological Control
- 2 June 2007
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- WHY SHORT‐TERM EXPERIMENTS MAY NOT ALLOW LONG‐TERM PREDICTIONS ABOUT INTRAGUILD PREDATIONEcological Applications, 2005
- Interactions between a hunting spider and a web‐builder: consequences of intraguild predation and cannibalism for prey suppressionEcological Entomology, 2004
- Testing intraguild predation theory in a field system: does numerical dominance shift along a gradient of productivity?Ecology Letters, 2003
- Interactions Between the Augmentatively Released Predaceous MiteGalendromus occidentalis(Acari: Phytoseiidae) and Naturally Occurring Generalist PredatorsEnvironmental Entomology, 2003
- Intraguild Prey Suffer from Enrichment of Their Resources: A Microcosm Experiment with CiliatesEcology, 2001
- Predation on immature parasitoids and its impact on aphid suppressionOecologia, 2001
- Effects of Enrichment on Three‐Level Food Chains with OmnivoryThe American Naturalist, 2000
- Persistence of Typhlodromus pyri and Metaseiulus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Apple After Inoculative Release and Competition with Zetzellia mali (Acari: Stigmaeidae)Environmental Entomology, 1992
- Biological Control of Apple Mites by Mixed Populations of Metaseiulus occidentalis (Nesbitt) and Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae)Environmental Entomology, 1992
- Competitive ExclusionThe American Naturalist, 1980