Cancer Patients' Roles in Treatment Decisions: Do Characteristics of the Decision Influence Roles?
- 1 October 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 28 (28), 4364-4370
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.26.8870
Abstract
Patients with more active roles in decisions are more satisfied and may have better health outcomes. Younger and better educated patients have more active roles in decisions, but whether patients' roles in decisions differ by characteristics of the decision itself is unknown. We surveyed a large, population-based cohort of patients with recently diagnosed lung or colorectal cancer about their roles in decisions regarding surgery, radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy. We used multinomial logistic regression to assess whether characteristics of the decision, including evidence about the treatment's benefit, whether the decision was likely preference-sensitive (palliative therapy for metastatic cancer), and treatment modality, influenced patients' roles in that decision. Of 10,939 decisions made by 5,383 patients, 38.9% were patient controlled, 43.6% were shared, and 17.5% were physician controlled. When there was good evidence to support a treatment, shared control was greatest; when evidence was uncertain, patient control was greatest; and when there was no evidence for or evidence against a treatment, physician control was greatest (overall P < .001). Decisions about treatments for metastatic cancers tended to be more physician controlled than other decisions (P < .001). Patients making decisions about treatments for which no evidence supports benefit and decisions about noncurative treatments reported more physician control, which suggests that patients may not want the responsibility of deciding on treatments that will not cure them. Better strategies for shared decision making may be needed when there is no evidence to support benefit of a treatment or when patients have terminal illnesses that cannot be cured.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physicians’ decision-making style and psychosocial outcomes among cancer survivorsPatient Education and Counseling, 2009
- What Is the Impact of Shared Decision Making on Treatment and Outcomes for Older Women With Breast Cancer?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Understanding Cancer Treatment and Outcomes: The Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance ConsortiumJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Patient Preferences for Medical Decision MakingMedical Care, 2000
- Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: A meta-analytic review.Health Psychology, 1997
- Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: A meta-analytic review.Health Psychology, 1997
- What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?Archives of Internal Medicine, 1996
- A 12-Item Short-Form Health SurveyMedical Care, 1996
- Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified ModelsEconometrica, 1982