WHAT ARE USER PERSPECTIVES OF EXOSKELETON TECHNOLOGY? A LITERATURE REVIEW
- 29 August 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 33 (2), 160-167
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462317000460
Abstract
Objectives: Exoskeletons are electromechanical devices that are worn by a human operator to increase their physical performance. Several exoskeletons have been developed to restore functional movements, such as walking, for those with paralysis due to neurological impairment. However, existing exoskeletons have limitations with respect to affordability, size, weight, speed, and efficiency, which may reduce their functional application. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review is to collect and narratively synthesize the perspectives of users of exoskeleton technology.Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across several healthcare related online databases.Results: A total of 4,619 articles were identified, of which 51 were selected for full review. Only three studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, one showed an incongruence between users’ expectations and experiences of device use; another reported perspectives on potential rather than actual device use, ranking design features in order of perceived importance; and the other reported ratings of ease of device use in training.Conclusions: The heterogeneity of studies included within this review, leave the authors unable to suggest consensus as to user perspectives of exoskeleton technology. However, it is apparent that users are able to suggest priorities for exoskeleton design and that users’ perspectives of exoskeleton technology might change in response to experience of use. The authors, therefore, suggest that exoskeleton design should be an iterative process, whereby user perspectives are sought, incorporated and refined by tangible experience, to ensure that devices developed are acceptable to and usable by the populations they seek to re-enable.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta-analysisMedical Devices: Evidence and Research, 2016
- Assistive technologies after stroke: self-management or fending for yourself? A focus group studyBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- The Next Generation of Exoskeletons: Lighter, Cheaper Devices Are in the WorksIEEE Pulse, 2012
- Safety and tolerance of the ReWalk™exoskeleton suit for ambulation by people with complete spinal cord injury: A pilot studyThe Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 2012
- Recent trends in assistive technology for mobilityJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2012
- Rehabilitation Exoskeletal RoboticsIEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 2010
- Upper-Limb ProstheticsAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2007
- Disabled Persons' Experience of Dependence on Assistive DevicesScandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2002
- The Voice of the Customer: Consumers Define the Ideal Battery ChargerAssistive Technology, 1997
- Assistive Technology and the Newly Disabled Adult: Adaptation to Wheelchair UseAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1993