A new measure of the effective number of tests, a practical tool for comparing families of non‐independent significance tests
- 13 February 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Genetic Epidemiology
- Vol. 33 (7), 559-568
- https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.20408
Abstract
p-Values from tests of significance can be combined using the Šidák correction (or the closely related Bonferroni correction) or Fisher's method, but both these methods require that the p-values combined be independent when all null hypotheses tested are true. In this paper adjustments to these methods are proposed, using a new eigenvalue-based measure of the effective number of independent tests to which the actual tests performed are equivalent, and are compared with adjustments proposed by previous authors. The adjusted methods are evaluated using a sample of 726 Alzheimer's disease (AD) cases and 707 group-matched controls, genotyped at 84,975 single-nucleotide polymorphism loci in 2,000 randomly chosen genes. The tests for genetic association with AD at loci within each gene are combined. The number of loci tested per gene varies from 2 to 994. The adjusted combined p-values agree well with the significance of the combined p-values determined empirically by random permutation of the data (Šidák correction: r=0.990; Fisher's method: r=0.994). This indicates that the combined p-values can be used to assess the relative strength of evidence for association of these genes with AD. The adjustment proposed here is a refinement of that of Nyholt ([2004] Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74:765–769), giving improved agreement with the results of random permutation. The improvement obtained is similar to that given by the refinement proposed by Li and Ji ([2005] Heredity 95:221–227). It is concluded that the concept of an effective number of tests is a valid approximation that allows p-values to be combined in a highly informative way. Genet. Epidemiol. 33:559–568, 2009.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of association methods for dense marker dataGenetic Epidemiology, 2008
- A multiple testing correction method for genetic association studies using correlated single nucleotide polymorphismsGenetic Epidemiology, 2008
- Population Structure and EigenanalysisPLoS Genetics, 2006
- Evaluation of Nyholt’s Procedure for Multiple Testing CorrectionHuman Heredity, 2005
- Evaluation of Nyholt’s Procedure for Multiple Testing Correction – Author’s ReplyHuman Heredity, 2005
- Efficient Computation of Significance Levels for Multiple Associations in Large Studies of Correlated Data, Including Genomewide Association StudiesAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2004
- A Simple Correction for Multiple Testing for Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Linkage Disequilibrium with Each OtherAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2004
- Permutation Tests for Linear ModelsAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 2001
- A Nonstochastic Interpretation of Reported Significance LevelsJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1983
- Rectangular Confidence Regions for the Means of Multivariate Normal DistributionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1967