Barriers and facilitators to care for the terminally ill: A cross-country case comparison study of Canada, England, Germany, and the United States
- 25 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Palliative Medicine
- Vol. 28 (2), 111-120
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216313493342
Abstract
Background: Why do many patients not die at their preferred location? Aim: Analyze system-level characteristics influencing the ability to implement best practices in delivering care for terminally ill adults (barriers and facilitators). Design: Cross-country comparison study from a “most similar—most different” perspective, triangulating evidence from a scoping review of the literature, document analyses, and semi-structured key informant interviews. Setting: Case study of Canada, England, Germany, and the United States. Results: While similar with regard to leading causes of death, patient needs, and potential avenues to care, different models of service provision were employed in the four countries studied. Although hospice and palliative care services were generally offered with standard care along the disease continuum and in various settings, and featured common elements such as physical, psycho-social, and spiritual care, outcomes (access, utilization, etc.) varied across jurisdictions. Barriers to best practice service provision included legislative (including jurisdictional), regulatory (e.g. education and training), and financial issues as well as public knowledge and perception (“giving up hope”) challenges. Advance care planning, dedicated and stable funding toward hospice and palliative care, including caregiver benefits, population aging, and standards of practice and guidelines to hospice and palliative care, were identified as facilitators. Conclusion: Successful implementation of effective and efficient best practice approaches to care for the terminally ill, such as shared care, requires concerted action to align these system-level characteristics; many factors were identified as being essential but not sufficient. Policy implementation needs to be tailored to the respective health-care system(s), monitored, and fine-tuned.This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sick To Death and Not Going to Take It Anymore!Published by University of California Press ,2020
- Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: a population survey in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and SpainAnnals of Oncology, 2012
- A Shared Care Model Pilot for Palliative Home Care in A Rural Area: Impact on Symptoms, Distress, and Place of DeathJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2011
- Are Regional Variations in End-of-Life Care Intensity Explained by Patient Preferences?Medical Care, 2007
- Trends in diabetes prevalence, incidence, and mortality in Ontario, Canada 1995–2005: a population-based studyThe Lancet, 2007
- Predictors of Place of Death for Seniors in Ontario: A Population-Based Cohort AnalysisCanadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 2006
- Baby Boomer Health DynamicsPublished by University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) ,2005
- Living Well at the End of Life: Adapting Health Care to Serious Chronic Illness in Old AgePublished by Rand Corporation ,2003
- Dying in Canada: Is It an Institutionalized, Technologically Supported Experience?Journal of Palliative Care, 2000
- Perceptions by Family Members of the Dying Experience of Older and Seriously Ill PatientsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997