Comparison of WHO/ISUP and WHO classification of noninvasive papillary urothelial neoplasms for risk of progression
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Urology
- Vol. 60 (2), 315-319
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01705-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of the WHO/ISUP Classification and Cytokeratin 20 Expression in Predicting the Behavior of Low-Grade Papillary Urothelial TumorsLaboratory Investigation, 2001
- STAGE PROGRESSION IN TA PAPILLARY UROTHELIAL TUMORS: RELATIONSHIP TO GRADE, IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL EXPRESSION OF TUMOR MARKERS, MITOTIC FREQUENCY AND DNA PLOIDYJournal of Urology, 2001
- Relationship of Cytokeratin 20 and CD44 Protein Expression with WHO/ISUP Grade in pTa and pT1 Papillary Urothelial NeoplasiaLaboratory Investigation, 2000
- The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Classification of Urothelial (Transitional Cell) Neoplasms of the Urinary BladderThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1998
- The Relationship Among Multiple Recurrences, Progression and Prognosis of Patients with Stages TA and T1 Transitional Cell Cancer of the Bladder Followed for at least 20 yearsJournal of Urology, 1995
- Differing Interpretations by Pathologists of the pT Category and Grade of Transitional Cell Cancer of the BladderBritish Journal of Urology, 1988
- Recurrence, Progression and Survival in Bladder CancerScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1987
- Analysis of the performance of pathologists in the grading of bladder tumorsHuman Pathology, 1983
- Epithelial Tumors of the BladderJournal of Urology, 1940
- EPITHELIOMA OF THE GENITO-URINARY ORGANSAnnals of Surgery, 1922