Abstract
This paper describes the problem of informative censoring in longitudinal studies where the primary outcome is rate of change in a continuous variable. Standard approaches based on the linear random effects model are valid only when the data are missing in a non-ignorable fashion. Informative censoring, which is a special type of non-ignorably missing data, occurs when the probability of early termination is related to an individual subject's true rate of change. When present, informative censoring causes bias in standard likelihood-based analyses, as well as in weighted averages of individual least-squares slopes. This paper reviews several methods proposed by others for analysis of informatively censored longitudinal data, and outlines a new approach based on a log-normal survival model. Maximum likelihood estimates may be obtained via the EM algorithm. Advantages of this approach are that it allows general unbalanced data caused by staggered entry and unequally-timed visits, it utilizes all available data, including data from patients with only a single measurement, and it provides a unified method for estimating all model parameters. Issues related to study design when informative censoring may occur are also discussed.