Putting ‘input’ in its proper place
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Second Language Research
- Vol. 15 (4), 337-388
- https://doi.org/10.1191/026765899674928444
Abstract
Every theory of second language acquisition (SLA) hypothesizes that learners come to know the properties of a language by being exposed to instances of it in meaningful conversation. Within SLA, the standard analysis of the ‘input question’ appears to be that input equals objective properties of the stimulus array less the effects of selective attention (the intake). In this paper, I offer a critique of the standard analysis. I claim that it is not interpretable in the absence of a theory of mental representation, theories of speech perception and language parsing, and a theory of language learning. I show that it cannot account for aspects of signal detection, phonetic or phonological learning. The standard treatment is essentially pretheoretical. I define an alternative position which distinguishes input to speech processing and input to language-learning mechanisms, drawing on the Autonomous Induction Theory – a novel theory of learning which is compatible with a modular view of processing and a view of linguistic cognition based on Universal Grammar (UG).Keywords
This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- GENERALIZABILITY AND AUTOMATICITY OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING UNDER IMPLICIT, INCIDENTAL, ENHANCED, AND INSTRUCTED CONDITIONSStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 1997
- Bootstrapping lexical acquisition: The role of prosodic structureThe Linguistic Review, 1996
- WHAT SORT OF INPUT IS NEEDED FOR INTAKE?International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1995
- Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrastThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1993
- AN INVESTIGATION OF TRANSFER IN SECOND LANGUAGE PHONOLOGYInternational Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1984
- The unintelligibility of speech to childrenJournal of Child Language, 1983
- “Perceptual centers” in speech production and perceptionPerception & Psychophysics, 1979
- Perceptual centers (P-centers).Psychological Review, 1976
- INTERLANGUAGEInternational Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1972
- THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LEARNER'S ERRORSInternational Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1967