Complications of Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Are Rare and Minor
- 1 March 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 56 (3), 295-300
- https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0b013e31827163f7
Abstract
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery, a minimally invasive procedure for treatment of early-stage rectal cancer, carcinoid tumors, and adenomas, is shown to be a safe procedure with very low perioperative morbidity. We aimed to compare the outcomes of transanal endoscopic microsurgery at a large volume tertiary care center with the existing literature. We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of 325 transanal endoscopic microsurgery procedures and looked for risk factors associated with complications. Indications for transanal endoscopic microsurgery included rectal adenocarcinomas, adenomas, and carcinoids. Procedures were performed by a single surgeon at a large-volume tertiary care center. Patients were enrolled over a 20-year period, and data were collected on demographics, perioperative details, tumor characteristics, and complications. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery was performed on all 325 patients. Main outcome measures were urinary retention, late bleeding requiring intervention, dehiscence, peritoneal cavity entry, conversion to abdominal approach, fecal soiling, and rectovaginal fistula. Intraoperative bleeding was associated with larger tumor size, whereas postoperative bleeding requiring intervention was not associated with any factors studied. Peritoneal cavity entry and urinary retention were more likely if the tumor was in either the anterior or lateral position in the rectum. The peritoneal cavity was entered in 9 patients, and conversion to abdominal approach occurred in 1 patient. Intraoperative bleeding, by surgeon's choice, and urinary retention, by patient's choice, were associated with a greater likelihood of admission to the inpatient ward. Fecal soiling was not reported by patients and not recorded. This study was limited because it was a retrospective analysis Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is an extremely safe procedure, offering very low perioperative morbidity. The overall morbidity found in our study was 10.5%, on par with published data for large series of 21%, 7.7%, and 14.9%. In contrast, complications from radical resection are reported at 18% to 55%.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Resection of Rectal Tumors: Outcomes and RecommendationsDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2010
- Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Rectal Neoplasms: Experience of 300 Consecutive CasesDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2009
- A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2009
- Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of selected patients with distal rectal cancer: 15 years experienceSurgical Endoscopy, 2008
- Complications after transanal endoscopic microsurgical resection correlate with location of rectal neoplasmsSurgical Endoscopy, 2007
- Full-thickness intraperitoneal excision by transanal endoscopic microsurgery does not increase short-term complicationsThe American Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Surgical cure for early rectal carcinoma and large adenoma: transanal endoscopic microsurgery (using ultrasound or electrosurgery) compared to conventional local and radical resectionInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2003
- Comparison of results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical resection for T1 carcinoma of the rectumSurgical Endoscopy, 1998
- Transanal Endoscopic MicrosurgeryArchives of Surgery, 1998
- Clinical results of transanal endoscopic microsurgerySurgical Endoscopy, 1988