Drinking histories of fatally injured drivers
Open Access
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Injury Prevention
- Vol. 8 (3), 221-226
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.8.3.221
Abstract
Context: About 30% of drivers killed in crashes have high blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) of 0.10+ g/dl. There is a question about whether these drivers primarily are problem drinkers who chronically drink and drive—the so-called hard core drinking drivers. Objective: To investigate drinking histories of fatally injured drivers in relation to their BACs. Design and participants: Retrospective cohort study of 818 fatally injured drivers who were included in the 1993 National Mortality Followback Survey (a national sample of US deaths in which next of kin were interviewed) and whose BACs were recorded by the Fatality Analysis Reporting System, a census of US traffic deaths. Main outcome measure: Problem drinking indicators. Results: At least one indicator of potential problem drinking, primarily heavy drinking, was reported for 68% of drivers with very high BACs (0.15+ g/dl), 41% with BACs of 0.10–0.14 g/dl, 32% with BACs of 0.01–0.09 g/dl, and 7% with zero BACs. Spouses provided more credible responses than other relatives: they were more likely to report at least occasional drinking and driving among deceased drivers with high BACs. For the most direct signs of problem drinking (described as a problem drinker during the last month of life or frequently driving after having five or more drinks), spousal reports suggested the prevalence of problem drinking among drivers with very high BACs was 22% (having both indicators), 32% (frequently driving after having five or more drinks), 44% (described as problem drinker), or 57% (having either indicator). Conclusions: Drivers with BACs of 0.10+ g/dl were far more likely than sober drivers to be described as having markers of problem drinking. However, many did not have indicators suggestive of problem drinking. In addition to programs focused on repeat offenders or problem drinkers, countermeasures such as sobriety checkpoints that target a broader spectrum of drinking drivers are appropriate.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of recent 0.08% legal blood alcohol limits on fatal crash involvementInjury Prevention, 2000
- Effects of ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses: a randomized trial in Maryland.American Journal of Public Health, 1999
- Chronic Drinking, Binge Drinking, and Drunk Driving IIPsychological Reports, 1999
- STRATEGIES TO REDUCE DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOLAnnual Review of Public Health, 1998
- Chronic Drinking, Binge Drinking and Drunk DrivingPsychological Reports, 1997
- Prevalence of alcohol-impaired driving. Results from a national self-reported survey of health behaviorsJAMA, 1997
- Drinking behavior in relation to cause of death among US adults.American Journal of Public Health, 1994
- Traffic safety effects of sobriety checkpoints and other local DWI programs in New Jersey.American Journal of Public Health, 1989
- Validity of Self‐reported Alcohol Use: a literature review and assessment*British Journal of Addiction, 1988
- Patient-Spouse Agreement on the Drinking Behaviors of AlcoholicsMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1987