Differences in the carcinogenic evaluation of glyphosate between the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Open Access
- 3 March 2016
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 70 (8), 741-745
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-207005
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Carcinogenicity of tetrachlorvinphos, parathion, malathion, diazinon, and glyphosateThe Lancet Oncology, 2015
- Risk assessment׳s insensitive toxicity testing may cause it to failEnvironmental Research, 2014
- Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Occupational Exposure to Agricultural Pesticide Chemical Groups and Active Ingredients: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2014
- Best Practices for Use of Historical Control Data of Proliferative Rodent LesionsToxicologic Pathology, 2009
- Why Public Health Agencies Cannot Depend on Good Laboratory Practices as a Criterion for Selecting Data: The Case of Bisphenol AEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 2009
- Cancer Incidence among Glyphosate-Exposed Pesticide Applicators in the Agricultural Health StudyEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 2005
- Evaluation of historical control data in carcinogenicity studiesHuman & Experimental Toxicology, 2003
- Integrative assessment of multiple pesticides as risk factors for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among menOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2003
- Value of Historical Control Data and Other Issues Related to the Evaluation of Long-Term Rodent Carcinogenicity StudiesToxicologic Pathology, 1997
- Use of Historical Control Data in Carcinogenicity Studies in RodentsToxicologic Pathology, 1984