Evaluating instruments for regulation of health care in the Netherlands
- 21 February 2011
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Vol. 17 (3), 411-419
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01431.x
Abstract
Reliable and valid judgments are necessary for regulatory authorities to merit confidence from care institutions and society and preserve authority. Moreover, limited reliability and validity of regulatory judgments increase the risk of limited improvement of the quality of health care. The goal of the study is to obtain insight in (dis) advantages of different regulatory instruments for regulation of health care. In this study, the reliability and validity of judgments generated by a lightly structured and highly structured regulatory instrument used by the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate are compared. Results indicate that the lightly structured instrument causes a large variety in discussed topics in regulatory visits: indicators pointing out potential risks in care are not always part of these discussions, by which incentives to improve care remain unjustly undone. Both types of instruments show variations in the meaning of judgments, indicating validity problems. The results of our study suggest that regulation of health care requires thorough appraisal of instruments. Several requirements are identified: first, an instrument that justifies the complexity of care with an accompanying explicit set of standards is necessary. Second, commitment of inspectors to the instrument is essential. And third, training of inspectors is indispensable.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Responsive regulation at the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority: An empirical assessment of assumptions underlying the theoryRegulation & Governance, 2009
- Health care accreditation surveyor styles typologyInternational Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 2008
- Health sector accreditation research: a systematic reviewInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2008
- Factors Influencing Best‐Practice Guideline Implementation: Lessons Learned from Administrators, Nursing Staff, and Project LeadersWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 2007
- Design and Implementation of a Performance Measurement System in Swedish Health Care ServicesQuality Management in Health Care, 2005
- Accreditation: a tool for organizational change in hospitals?International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 2004
- Costs of Quality Management Systems in Long-Term Care OrganizationsQuality Management in Health Care, 2003
- The Role of Regulation in Quality ImprovementThe Milbank Quarterly, 1998
- Variations in Regulatory Enforcement StylesLaw & Policy, 1989
- Continuous Improvement as an Ideal in Health CareThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1989