Impact of care at a multidisciplinary congestive heart failure clinic: a randomized trial
Open Access
- 5 July 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 173 (1), 40-45
- https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1041137
Abstract
Background: Although multidisciplinary congestive heart failure clinics in the United States appear to be effective in reducing the number of hospital readmissions, it is unclear whether the same benefit is seen in countries such as Canada, where access to both general and specialized medical care is free and unrestricted. We sought to determine the impact of care at a multidisciplinary specialized outpatient congestive heart failure clinic compared with standard care. Methods: We randomly assigned 230 eligible patients who had experienced an acute episode of congestive heart failure to standard care (n = 115) or follow-up at a multidisciplinary specialized heart failure outpatient clinic (n = 115). The intervention consisted of a structured outpatient clinic environment with complete access to cardiologists and allied health professionals. The primary outcomes were all-cause hospital admission rates and total number of days in hospital at 6 months. The secondary outcomes were total number of emergency department visits, quality of life and total mortality. Results: At 6 months, fewer patients in the intervention group had required readmission to hospital than patients in the control group (45 [39%] v. 66 [57%], crude hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38–0.92. Patients in the intervention group stayed in hospital for 514 days compared with 815 days required by patients in the control group (adjusted HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35–0.89). The number of patients seen in the emergency department and the total number of emergency department visits were similar in the intervention and control groups. At 6 months, quality of life, which was self-assessed using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, was unchanged in the control group but improved in the intervention group (p < 0.001). No difference in mortality was observed, with 19 deaths in the control group and 12 in the intervention group (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.24–1.54). Interpretation: Compared with usual care, care at a multidisciplinary specialized congestive heart failure outpatient clinic reduced the number of hospital readmissions and hospital days and improved quality of life. When our results are integrated with those from other, similar trials, multidisciplinary disease management strategies for congestive heart failure are associated with clinically worthwhile improvements in survival.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admissionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2004
- Is multidisciplinary care of heart failure cost‐beneficial when combined with optimal medical care?European Journal of Heart Failure, 2003
- Nurse-led heart failure clinics improve survival and self-care behaviour in patients with heart failureResults from a prospective, randomised trialEuropean Heart Journal, 2003
- Cost/utility ratio in chronic heart failure: comparison between heart failure management program delivered by day-hospital and usual careJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- A randomized trial of the efficacy of multidisciplinary care in heart failure outpatients at high risk of hospital readmissionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- Randomized, controlled trial of integrated heart failure management. The Auckland Heart Failure Management StudyEuropean Heart Journal, 2002
- β-Blockers in Congestive Heart Failure: A Bayesian Meta-AnalysisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Cost effective management programme for heart failure reduces hospitalisationHeart, 1998
- Overview of Randomized Trials of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors on Mortality and Morbidity in Patients With Heart FailureJAMA, 1995
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958