A Comparison of Differences Between Students Labeled Learning Disabled and Low Achieving on Measures of Classroom Performance
- 1 November 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Learning Disabilities
- Vol. 19 (9), 545-552
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948601900906
Abstract
Editor's Comments: Much has been written about the identification of the learning disabled. The two following articles found that identified learning disabled populations are indeed different from other types of school populations on specific variables. However, the authors differ on some critical points. Readers' comments are welcome.—JLW Classroom performance measures of reading, spelling, and written expression developed at the University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities were administered weekly over a 5-week period to 71 fifth-grade students. Although 34 of these students had been identified as LD by their schools and 37 were low achievers who had not been identified as LD, no meaningful differences had been found between their performances on several commonly used norm-referenced devices. Examination of the students' weekly performance on the classroom performance measures revealed both significant and practical differences in performance on the measures of reading, spelling, and spelling accuracy on a written expression task; no differences were found in their rates of improvement over the 5-week period. Students did not differ significantly in other methods of evaluating their writing. In general, the findings support the hypothesis that teachers' referral decisions are based on what they observe students doing in the classroom and that the subsequent administration of norm-referenced tests may reflect an inefficient confirmatory process. The implications of the findings for classification of students as LD and current practice are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Application of Curriculum-Based Assessment: The Use of Direct and Repeated MeasurementExceptional Children, 1985
- Eligibility for Learning Disability Services: A Direct and Repeated Measurement ApproachExceptional Children, 1984
- “I Know One When I See One” — Differentiating LD and Non-LD StudentsLearning Disability Quarterly, 1984
- The Effects of Frequent Curriculum-Based Measurement and Evaluation on Pedagogy, Student Achievement, and Student Awareness of LearningAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1984
- Probabilities Associated with the Referral to Placement ProcessTeacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 1982
- Interjudge agreement in classifying students as learning disabledPsychology in the Schools, 1982
- Valid Measurement Procedures for Continuous Evaluation of Written ExpressionExceptional Children, 1982
- Relationship between word difficulty and access of single-word meaning by skilled and less skilled readers.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976
- Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975
- Toward a theory of automatic information processing in readingCognitive Psychology, 1974