The health impacts of waste-to-energy emissions: a systematic review of the literature
Open Access
- 1 December 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Environmental Research Letters
- Vol. 15 (12), 123006
- https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abae9f
Abstract
Waste-to-energy (WtE) processes, or the combustion of refuse-derived fuel (RDF) for energy generation, has the potential to reduce landfill volume while providing a renewable energy source. We aimed to systematically review and summarise current evidence on the potential health effects (benefits and risks) of exposure to WtE/RDF-related combustion emissions. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar using terms related to health and WtE/RDF combustion emissions, following PRISMA guidelines. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and then full-texts of original, peer-reviewed research articles published until 20th March 2020, plus their relevant references. Overall quality of included epidemiological studies were rated using an amended Navigation framework. We found 19 articles from 269 search results that met our inclusion criteria, including two epidemiological studies, five environmental monitoring studies, seven health impact or risk assessments (HIA/HRA), and five life-cycle assessments. We found a dearth of health studies related to the impacts of exposure to WtE emissions. The limited evidence suggests that well-designed and operated WtE facilities using sorted feedstock (RDF) are critical to reduce potential adverse health (cancer and non-cancer) impacts, due to lower hazardous combustion-related emissions, compared to landfill or unsorted incineration. Poorly fed WtE facilities may emit concentrated toxins with serious potential health risks, such as dioxins/furans and heavy metals; these toxins may remain problematic in bottom ash as a combustion by-product. Most modelling studies estimate that electricity (per unit) generated from WtE generally emits less health-relevant air pollutants (also less greenhouse gases) than from combustion of fossil fuels (e.g. coal). Some modelled estimates vary due to model sensitivity for type of waste processed, model inputs used, and facility operational conditions. We conclude that rigorous assessment (e.g. HRA including sensitivity analyses) of WtE facility/technological characteristics and refuse type used is necessary when planning/proposing facilities to protect human health as the technology is adopted worldwide.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1116412)
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Review of Exposure Assessment Methods in Epidemiological Studies on IncineratorsJournal of Environmental and Public Health, 2013
- Chemical, dimensional and morphological ultrafine particle characterization from a waste-to-energy plantWaste Management, 2011
- Health impact assessment of waste management facilities in three European countriesEnvironmental Health, 2011
- Dimensional and chemical characterization of particles at a downwind receptor site of a waste-to-energy plantWaste Management, 2010
- Systematic review of epidemiological studies on health effects associated with management of solid wasteEnvironmental Health, 2009
- LCA to choose among alternative design solutions: The case study of a new Italian incineration lineWaste Management, 2009
- A review of waste management practices and their impact on human healthWaste Management, 2009
- Risk for non Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the vicinity of French municipal solid waste incineratorsEnvironmental Health, 2008
- Sarcoma risk and dioxin emissions from incinerators and industrial plants: a population-based case-control study (Italy)Environmental Health, 2007
- Linking environmental effects to health impacts: a computer modelling approach for air pollutionJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2005