Validity of British Thoracic Society guidance (the CRB-65 rule) for predicting the severity of pneumonia in general practice: systematic review and meta-analysis
Open Access
- 1 October 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal College of General Practitioners in British Journal of General Practice
- Vol. 60 (579), e423-e433
- https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp10x532422
Abstract
The CRB-65 score is a clinical prediction rule that grades the severity of community-acquired pneumonia in terms of 30-day mortality. The study sought to validate CRB-65 and assess its clinical value in community and hospital settings. Systematic review and meta-analysis of validation studies of CRB-65. Medline (1966 to June 2009), Embase (1988 to November 2008), British Nursing Index (BNI) and PsychINFO were searched, using a diagnostic accuracy search filter combined with subject-specific terms. The derived (index) rule was used as a predictive model and applied to all validation studies. Comparison was made between the observed and predicted number of deaths stratified by risk group (low, intermediate, and high) and setting of care (community or hospital). Pooled results are presented as risk ratios (RRs) in terms of over-prediction (RR>1) or under-prediction (RR<1) of 30-day mortality. Fourteen validation studies totalling 397 875 patients are included. CRB-65 performs well in hospitalised patients, particularly in those classified as intermediate (RR 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.71 to 1.17) or high risk (RR 1.01, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.16). In community settings, CRB-65 over-predicts the probability of 30-day mortality across all strata of predicted risk, low (RR 9.41, 95% CI = 1.75 to 50.66), intermediate (RR 4.84, 95% CI = 2.61 to 8.69), and high (RR 1.58, 95% CI = 0.59 to 4.19). CRB-65 performs well in stratifying severity of pneumonia and resultant 30-day mortality in hospital settings. In community settings, CRB-65 appears to over-predict the probability of 30-day mortality across all strata of predicted risk. Caution is needed when applying CRB-65 to patients in general practice.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- New perspectives on community-acquired pneumonia in 388 406 patients. Results from a nationwide mandatory performance measurement programme in healthcare qualityThorax, 2009
- Prognosis of primary care patients aged 80 years and older with lower respiratory tract infectionBritish Journal of General Practice, 2009
- C-reactive protein and community-acquired pneumonia in ambulatory care: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studiesFamily Practice, 2008
- Prediction of complicated lower respiratory tract infections in older patients with diabetesBritish Journal of General Practice, 2008
- Risk Prediction With Procalcitonin and Clinical Rules in Community-Acquired PneumoniaAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2008
- Predicting mortality with pneumonia severity scores: importance of model recalibration to local settingsEpidemiology and Infection, 2008
- Sepsis severity predicts outcome in community-acquired pneumococcal pneumoniaEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2007
- The CURB65 pneumonia severity score outperforms generic sepsis and early warning scores in predicting mortality in community-acquired pneumoniaThorax, 2007
- Prospective comparison of three predictive rules for assessing severity of community-acquired pneumonia in Hong KongThorax, 2007
- Severity assessment criteria recommended by the British Thoracic Society (BTS) for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and older patients. Should SOAR (systolic blood pressure, oxygenation, age and respiratory rate) criteria be used in older people? A compilation study of two prospective cohortsAge and Ageing, 2006