The Experimental Approach to Development Economics
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2009
- journal article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Economics
- Vol. 1 (1), 151-178
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.143235
Abstract
Randomized experiments have become a popular tool in development economics research and have been the subject of a number of criticisms. This paper reviews the recent literature and discusses the strengths and limitations of this approach in theory and in practice. We argue that the main virtue of randomized experiments is that, owing to the close collaboration between researchers and implementers, they allow the estimation of parameters that would not otherwise be possible to evaluate. We discuss the concerns that have been raised regarding experiments and generally conclude that, although real, they are often not specific to experiments. We conclude by discussing the relationship between theory and experiments.Keywords
Other Versions
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testing the correlated random coefficient modelJournal of Econometrics, 2010
- The Demand for, and Impact of, Learning HIV StatusAmerican Economic Review, 2008
- How High Are Rates of Return to Fertilizer? Evidence from Field Experiments in KenyaAmerican Economic Review, 2008
- Remedying Education: Evidence from Two Randomized Experiments in IndiaThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2007
- The Illusion of SustainabilityThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2007
- Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in IndonesiaJournal of Political Economy, 2007
- Free Distribution or Cost-Sharing? Evidence from a Randomized Malaria Prevention ExperimentSSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
- Tying Odysseus to the Mast: Evidence From a Commitment Savings Product in the PhilippinesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2006
- Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in IndiaEconometrica, 2004
- Identification problems and decisions under ambiguity: Empirical analysis of treatment response and normative analysis of treatment choiceJournal of Econometrics, 1999