Making Intangibles “Tangible” in Tests of Resource-Based Theory
- 15 March 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Management
- Vol. 37 (5), 1496-1518
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310394185
Abstract
The authors identify theoretical disconnects among resource-based theory (RBT), conceptualizations of intangible resources (intangibles), and measures of intangibles. Specifically, the authors’ survey of 186 recent empirical tests of RBT suggests that measures of intangibles are often assigned with little theoretical conceptualization of the intangible construct or connection with RBT. This lack of theoretical justification undermines confidence in measures and empirical findings, leaves central RBT questions unaddressed, and constricts the usefulness of RBT. Furthermore, their survey suggests that the dominant approach to measuring intangibles is mechanical and unidisciplinary (i.e., rooted in either economics or psychology). The authors argue that the challenge of measuring intangibles is primarily theoretical. Thus, mechanical and unidisciplinary approaches are problematic for they sustain theoretical disconnects among RBT and intangible conceptualizations and measures. Moreover, a multidisciplinary construct validation approach is required to remedy the respective deficiencies of economic and psychological approaches and integrate their complementary strengths. The authors present such an approach, which they call the multidisciplinary assessment process (MAP). The MAP guides scholars in creating theories of intangibles that are specific to their RBT study. These theories are the focal point of the MAP and clarify what, specifically, the intangible is and how firms use the intangible to create and appropriate economic value. In turn, these theories inform the measurement and validation steps of the MAP, so that intangibles are assessed with greater credibility.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Construct Validity: Advances in Theory and MethodologyAnnual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2009
- Effects of selection and training on unit-level performance over time: A latent growth modeling approach.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009
- Strategic resources and performance: a meta‐analysisStrategic Management Journal, 2008
- Entrepreneurship, subjectivism, and the resource‐based view: toward a new synthesisStrategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2008
- A Review of Approaches to Empirical Research on the Resource-Based View of the Firm†Journal of Management, 2007
- Tests of the resource-based view: do the empirics have any clothes?Strategic Organization, 2006
- Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? YesAcademy of Management Review, 2001
- Concept Fallibility in Organizational ScienceAcademy of Management Review, 1989
- Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing PracticesJournal of Marketing Research, 1981
- Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1955