Tedizolid Phosphate vs Linezolid for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 13 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Jama-Journal Of The American Medical Association
- Vol. 309 (6), 559-569
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.241
Abstract
Importance Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs), including cellulitis or erysipelas, major cutaneous abscesses, and wound infections, can be life-threatening and may require surgery and hospitalization. Increasingly, ABSSSIs are associated with drug-resistant pathogens, and many antimicrobial agents have adverse effects restricting their use. Tedizolid phosphate is a novel oxazolidinone in development for the treatment of ABSSSIs. Objectives To establish the noninferiority of tedizolid phosphate vs linezolid in treating ABSSSIs and compare the safety of the 2 agents. Design, Setting, and Patients The Efficacy and Safety of 6-day Oral Tedizolid in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections vs 10-day Oral Linezolid Therapy (ESTABLISH-1) was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial that was conducted from August 2010 through September 2011 at 81 study centers in North America, Latin America, and Europe. The intent-to-treat analysis set consisted of data from 667 adults aged 18 years or older with ABSSSIs treated with tedizolid phosphate (n = 332) or linezolid (n = 335). Interventions A 200 mg once daily dose of oral tedizolid phosphate for 6 days or 600 mg of oral linezolid every 12 hours for 10 days. Main Outcome Measures The primary efficacy outcome was early clinical response at the 48- to 72-hour assessment (no increase in lesion surface area from baseline and oral temperature of ≤37.6°C, confirmed by a second temperature measurement within 24 hours). A 10% noninferiority margin was predefined. Results In the intent-to-treat analysis set, the early clinical treatment response rates were 79.5% (95% CI, 74.8% to 83.7%) of 332 patients in the tedizolid phosphate group and 79.4% (95% CI, 74.7% to 83.6%) of 335 patients in the linezolid group (a treatment difference of 0.1% [95% CI, −6.1% to 6.2%]). The sustained clinical treatment response rates at the end of treatment (day 11) were 69.3% (95% CI, 64.0% to 74.2%) in the tedizolid phosphate group and 71.9% (95% CI, 66.8% to 76.7%) in the linezolid group (a treatment difference of −2.6% [95% CI, −9.6% to 4.2%]). Results of investigator-assessed clinical treatment success rates at a posttherapy evaluation visit (1-2 weeks after the end-of-treatment visit) were 85.5% (95% CI, 81.3% to 89.1%) in the tedizolid phosphate group and 86.0% (95% CI, 81.8% to 89.5%) in the linezolid group (a treatment difference of −0.5% [95% CI, −5.8% to 4.9%), and were similar for 178 patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the primary lesion. Conclusions and Relevance Tedizolid phosphate was a statistically noninferior treatment to linezolid in early clinical response at 48 to 72 hours after initiating therapy for an ABSSSI. Tedizolid phosphate may be a reasonable alternative to linezolid for treating ABSSSI. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01170221Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- The oxazolidinones: past, present, and futureAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2011
- Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Dose-Ranging Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Population Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Oral Torezolid Phosphate in Patients with Complicated Skin and Skin Structure InfectionsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2011
- Analysis of Linezolid‐Associated Hematologic Toxicities in a Large Veterans Affairs Medical CenterPharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 2010
- Dissemination of Methicillin‐ResistantStaphylococcus aureusUSA300 Sequence Type 8 Lineage in Latin AmericaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Community-associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Outpatients, United States, 1999–2006Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Board-certified emergency physicians' treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in the community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus eraThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2009
- In Vitro Activity of TR-700, the Antibacterial Moiety of the Prodrug TR-701, against Linezolid-Resistant StrainsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2008
- Early Appropriate Parenteral Antimicrobial Treatment of Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections Caused by Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusSurgical Infections, 2008
- Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States, 2002-2006Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2008
- Good Clinical Outcomes but High Rates of Adverse Reactions during Linezolid Therapy for Serious Infections: a Proposed Protocol for Monitoring Therapy in Complex PatientsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2006