A comparison of two measures of quality of life: their sensitivity and validity for patients with advanced cancer
- 1 October 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Palliative Medicine
- Vol. 8 (4), 282-290
- https://doi.org/10.1177/026921639400800403
Abstract
We compared two measures that have been used by professionals to assess the quality of life and care of patients wtih advanced cancer. The Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS) is an instrument for palliative cancer support teams to record and evaluate their care; the Hebrew Rehabilitation Centre for the Aged Quality of Life (HRCA-QL) index was used in the National Hospice Study (USA) to assess patients with advanced cancer. STAS has 17 items, each scaled 0 (best) to 4 (worst), and HRCA-QL has five items scaled 0 (worst) to 2 (best). The STAS and the HRCA-QL were assessed contemporaneously by the members of one support team on 128 consecutive patients referred over 17 months. Seventy-four patients spent more than four weeks in care. Ratings for four out of five HRCA-QL items deteriorated significantly in the four to six weeks before death. HRCA-QL index items correlated with similar STAS items. Correlations were highest at referral, especially in patients seen more than four weeks before death (e.g. symptom control (STAS) with health (HRCA-QL) Spearman's p = -0.64) and the HRCA-QL total was correlated with STAS subtotal of six items (p = -0.45). There were few correlations at death. The findings support the validity of both measures for the aspects compared, but indicated that STAS was more sensitive to changes in patients in the last six weeks of life.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity of the support team assessment schedule: do staffs' ratings reflect those made by patients or their families?Palliative Medicine, 1993
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptom ChecklistBritish Journal of Cancer, 1990
- Palliative care: views of patients and their families.BMJ, 1990
- Assessing quality of life in cancer patientsBritish Journal of Cancer, 1989
- Quality of life of cancer patients at different stages in the disease trajectoryJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- An alternative in terminal care: Results of the national hospice studyJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- Whither hospice evaluationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1983
- THE ST THOMAS' HOSPITAL TERMINAL CARE SUPPORT TEAM: A New Concept of Hospice CareThe Lancet, 1981
- Measuring the quality of life of cancer patientsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1981