Temporal Trends in Cardiogenic Shock Treatment and Outcomes Among Ontario Patients With Myocardial Infarction Between 1992 and 2008
- 1 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
- Vol. 4 (4), 440-447
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.110.959262
Abstract
Clinical trials have demonstrated that emergent revascularization improves survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS). However, rates of uptake and impact on outcomes remain uncertain. We identified 9750 patients (3.1%) with CS among 311 183 AMI patients in the Ontario Myocardial Infarction Database between 1992 and 2008 (55.8% men; mean age, 73 years). CS incidence, mortality, revascularization, and transfers from nonrevascularization sites were studied over 3 periods: period 1, before the 1999 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association AMI guidelines recommending urgent revascularization for patients P P P <0.001). Publication of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines was followed by increased revascularization and transfer rates, along with declining mortality rates among Ontario AMI patients with CS. These results highlight possibilities for further improvement, particularly among patients eligible for transfer from nonrevascularization sites.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Thirty-Year Trends (1975 to 2005) in the Magnitude of, Management of, and Hospital Death Rates Associated With Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 2009
- A Citywide Protocol for Primary PCI in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- ICD-10 adaptations of the Ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules performed as well as the original versionsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2007
- Interhospital transfer for early revascularization in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock—a report from the SHould we revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? (SHOCK) trial and registryAmerican Heart Journal, 2006
- Trends in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, 1979-2003, United StatesAmerican Heart Journal, 2006
- Risk-Treatment Mismatch in the Pharmacotherapy of Heart FailureJAMA, 2005
- Outcome of patients aged ≥75 years in the SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shocK (SHOCK) trial: Do elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock respond differently to emergent revascularization?American Heart Journal, 2005
- ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction—Executive SummaryCirculation, 2004
- Early Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic ShockNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- The in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: Incidence, predictors of occurrence, outcome and prognostic factorsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989