Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 January 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Value in Health
- Vol. 22 (1), 23-30
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- ESTIMATING HEALTH STATE UTILITY VALUES FROM DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS—A QALY SPACE MODEL APPROACHHealth Economics, 2014
- Challenges to time trade-off utility assessment methods: when should you consider alternative approaches?Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 2014
- Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task ForceValue in Health, 2013
- Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility valuesJournal of Health Economics, 2012
- Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)Quality of Life Research, 2011
- A uniform time trade off method for states better and worse than dead: feasibility study of the ‘lead time’ approachHealth Economics, 2011
- The episodic random utility model unifies time trade-off and discrete choice approaches in health state valuationPopulation Health Metrics, 2009
- Rescaling quality of life values from discrete choice experiments for use as QALYs: a cautionary talePopulation Health Metrics, 2008
- Extrinsic Goals and Time TradeoffMedical Decision Making, 2007
- The “utility” of the time trade-off method in cancer patients: Feasibility and proportional trade-offJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995