What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices
Open Access
- 30 June 2012
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Cognition
- Vol. 123 (3), 434-441
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.001
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Disrupting the right prefrontal cortex alters moral judgementSocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2011
- The neural basis of intuitive and counterintuitive moral judgmentSocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2011
- Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- Behavioral norms for condensed moral vignettesSocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2010
- On the wrong side of the trolley track: neural correlates of relative social valuationSocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2010
- Throwing a Bomb on a Person Versus Throwing a Person on a BombPsychological Science, 2007
- The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluationNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2006
- Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000
- Human agency in social cognitive theory.American Psychologist, 1989
- Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972