Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case‐control study
Open Access
- 6 March 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 119 (6), 724-730
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03293.x
Abstract
To investigate the association between the geometrical properties of episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) because episiotomies angled at 40–60° are associated with fewer OASIS than episiotomies with more acute angles. Case–control study. University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø and Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway. Seventy-four women who had one vaginal birth and episiotomy. Cases (n = 37) have sustained OASIS at birth, while controls (n = 37) had not. The groups were matched for instrumental delivery. Two groups of women with history of only one vaginal birth were compared. Episiotomy scar was identified and photographed and relevant measures were taken. Data were analysed using conditional logistic analysis. Mean episiotomy angle, length, depth, incision point. The risk of sustaining OASIS decreased by 70% (odds ratio [OR] 0.30; 95% CI 0.14–0.66) for each 5.5-mm increase in episiotomy depth, decreased by 56% (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23–0.86) for each 4.5-mm increase in the distance from the midline to the incision point of the episiotomy, and decreased by 75% (OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.10–0.61) for each 5.5-mm increase in episiotomy length. Lastly, there was no difference in mean angle between groups but there was a “U-shaped” association between angle and OASIS (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.02–4.28) with an increased risk (OR 9.00; 95% CI 1.1–71.0) of OASIS when the angle was either smaller than 15°or >60°. The present study showed that scarred episiotomies with depth > 16 mm, length > 17 mm, incision point > 9 mm lateral of midpoint and angle range 30–60° are significantly associated with less risk of OASIS. Shrinkage of tissue must be considered.This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Multicenter Interventional Program to Reduce the Incidence of Anal Sphincter TearsObstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
- Trends in Risk Factors for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries in NorwayObstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
- Lateral episiotomy protects primiparous but not multiparous women from obstetric anal sphincter ruptureActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2009
- A prospective multicenter audit of labor‐room episiotomy and anal sphincter injury assessment in the NetherlandsInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2009
- Is the policy of restrictive episiotomy generalisable? A prospective observational studyThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2009
- Decreasing the Incidence of Anal Sphincter Tears During DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 2008
- Risk Factors for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Prospective StudyBirth, 2006
- Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury?*BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2006
- Anal incontinence after obstetric sphincter tears: incidence in a Norwegian countyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2004
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986