An Individually Adjustable Oral Appliance vs Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Mild-to-Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier BV in Chest
- Vol. 122 (2), 569-575
- https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.122.2.569
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prospective randomized comparison of impedance-controlled auto-continuous positive airway pressure (APAPFOT) with constant CPAPSleep Medicine, 2001
- Autoadjusting CPAP Therapy Based on Impedance Efficacy, Compliance and AcceptanceAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2001
- A Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial of Two Oral Appliances for Sleep Apnea TreatmentAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2000
- A Crossover Study Comparing the Efficacy of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure With Anterior Mandibular Positioning Devices on Patients With Obstructive Sleep ApneaChest, 1996
- A Randomized Crossover Study of an Oral Appliance vs Nasal-Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in the Treatment of Mild-Moderate Obstructive Sleep ApneaChest, 1996
- Efficacy of a Herbst mandibular advancement device in obstructive sleep apnea.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1994
- Treatment of Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea with a Dental OrthosisChest, 1991
- Pharyngeal shape and dimensions in healthy subjects, snorers, and patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.Thorax, 1990
- The effect of a modified functional appliance on obstructive sleep apneaAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1988
- REVERSAL OF OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNOEA BY CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE APPLIED THROUGH THE NARESThe Lancet, 1981