Patient and Provider Attitudes Toward the Use of Patient Portals for the Management of Chronic Disease: A Systematic Review
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 20 February 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Vol. 17 (2), e40
- https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3703
Abstract
Background: Patient portals provide patients with the tools to better manage and understand their health status. However, widespread adoption of patient portals faces resistance from patients and providers for a number of reasons, and there is limited evidence evaluating the characteristics of patient portals that received positive remarks from patients and providers. Objective: The objectives of this systematic review are to identify the shared characteristics of portals that receive favorable responses from patients and providers and to identify the elements that patients and providers believe need improvement. Methods: The authors conducted a systematic search of the CINAHL and PubMed databases to gather data about the use of patient portals in the management of chronic disease. Two reviewers analyzed the articles collected in the search process in order remove irrelevant articles. The authors selected 27 articles to use in the literature review. Results: Results of this systematic review conclude that patient portals show significant improvements in patient self-management of chronic disease and improve the quality of care provided by providers. The most prevalent positive attribute was patient-provider communication, which appeared in 10 of 27 articles (37%). This was noted by both patients and providers. The most prevalent negative perceptions are security (concerns) and user-friendliness, both of which occurred in 11 of 27 articles (41%). The user-friendliness quality was a concern for patients and providers who are not familiar with advanced technology and therefore find it difficult to navigate the patient portal. The high cost of installation and maintenance of a portal system, not surprisingly, deters some providers from implementing such technology into their practice, but this was only mentioned in 3 of the 27 articles (11%). It is possible that the incentives for meaningful use assuage the barrier of cost. Conclusions: This systematic review revealed mixed attitudes from patients and their providers regarding the use of patient portals to manage their chronic disease. The authors suggest that a standard patient portal design providing patients with the resources to understand and manage their chronic conditions will promote the adoption of patient portals in health care organizations. [J Med Internet Res 2015;17(2):e40]Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding Patient Portal Use: Implications for Medication ManagementJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2013
- Improving Diabetes Management With a Patient Portal: A Qualitative Study of Diabetes Self-Management PortalJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2012
- The Impact of Electronic Patient Portals on Patient Care: A Systematic Review of Controlled TrialsJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2012
- Patient reported barriers to enrolling in a patient portalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2011
- Patient Web Portals to Improve Diabetes Outcomes: A Systematic ReviewCurrent Diabetes Reports, 2010
- The Literacy Divide: Health Literacy and the Use of an Internet-Based Patient Portal in an Integrated Health System—Results from the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE)Journal of Health Communication, 2010
- Usability Testing Finds Problems for Novice Users of Pediatric PortalsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2009
- Patient Use of Secure Electronic Messaging Within a Shared Medical Record: A Cross-sectional StudyJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2009
- Health Coaching via an Internet Portal for Primary Care Patients With Chronic ConditionsMedical Care, 2009
- Interest in the Use of Computerized Patient Portals: Role of the Provider–Patient RelationshipJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007