Connectedness Versus Separateness: Applicability of Family Therapy to Japanese Families
- 1 December 1992
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Wiley in Family Process
- Vol. 31 (4), 319-340
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1992.00319.x
Abstract
This article, a product of the two authors' multicultural experiences, contrasts British and Japanese families in order to examine the applicability of the Western model of family therapy to Japanese families and therapists. Areas where the Western model is incompatible are identified, and modifications to fit the Japanese indigenous model are suggested. The most significant difference in value systems between the two cultures is the Japanese preference for connectedness. The Japanese person is seen as a part of the embedded interconnectedness of relationships, whereas British norms prioritize separateness and clear boundaries in relationships, individuality, and autonomy. This value orientation is manifested in the Japanese language, hierarchical nature of the family structure, the family life cycle, and the implicit communication style. Systemic thinking, which deals with the pattern of relationships, is valid for all families regardless of cultural differences. But therapists should note that the preferred direction of change for Japanese families in therapy, is toward a process of integration--how a person can be effectively integrated into the given system--rather than a process of differentiation. An authoritative therapist style, the use of individual sessions, silence, and other nonverbal techniques are relevant to bringing about the desired change toward better integration of the individual with his or her networks.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Kan‐No‐Mushi: An Inner Externalization that Enables Compromise?Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 1990
- Annotation: culture and family therapyJournal of Family Therapy, 1989
- Plea for acceptance: School refusal syndrome in JapanSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 1986
- Cultural relativism-relative agreementJournal of Family Therapy, 1985
- Family therapy and the problem of cultural relativism: a reply to Dr LauJournal of Family Therapy, 1985
- Structural Family Therapy. Its Application to Chinese FamiliesFamily Process, 1984
- Transcultural issues in family therapyJournal of Family Therapy, 1984
- Migration and Family ConflictFamily Process, 1979
- The Conception of Nature in Japanese CultureScience, 1974
- Cross-Cultural Family Therapy - A Malaysian ExperienceFamily Process, 1972