The Outcome Effect and Professional Skepticism
- 1 March 2016
- journal article
- Published by American Accounting Association in The Accounting Review
- Vol. 91 (6), 1577-1599
- https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51448
Abstract
Despite the importance placed on professional skepticism by the accounting profession and regulators, the failure of auditors to exercise an appropriate level of skepticism continues to be a global issue. We experimentally test a potential barrier to skepticism. We find that outcome knowledge biases supervisors' evaluations of skeptical behavior. Holding a staff member's skeptical judgments and acts constant, superiors on the engagement team evaluate the staff's skeptical behavior based on whether the staff's investigation of an issue ultimately identifies a misstatement. Our evidence suggests that evaluators penalize auditors who employ an appropriate level of skepticism, but do not identify a misstatement. Although consultation with their superior while exercising skepticism improved staff auditors' performance evaluations, consultation did not effectively mitigate the outcome effect on their evaluations. Last, we observe that auditors in the field anticipate that their superiors will be influenced by outcome knowledge when they evaluate their skeptical behavior. Collectively, our results depict an evaluation system that may inadvertently discourage skepticism amongst auditors in the field.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- The outcome effect – A review and implications for future researchJournal of Accounting Literature, 2013
- Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements*Contemporary Accounting Research, 2011
- Defensive Medicine Among High-Risk Specialist Physicians in a Volatile Malpractice EnvironmentJAMA, 2005
- A Meta-Analysis of Research on Hindsight BiasBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 2004
- Performance Evaluation Judgments: Effects of Prior Experience Under Different Performance Evaluation Schemes and Feedback FrequenciesJournal of Accounting Research, 1999
- An Experimental Investigation of Explanations for Outcome Effects on Appraisals of Capital‐Budgeting Decisions*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1993
- Outcome bias in decision evaluation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of actionOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976
- Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975