Short-term costs of conventional vs laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial)
Open Access
- 6 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 95 (1), 6-12
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603203
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Case-Matched Comparison of Clinical and Financial Outcome After Laparoscopic or Open Colorectal SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s diseaseSurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- Assessing the relative costs of standard open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer in a randomised controlled trial in the United KingdomCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2000
- Is laparoscopic resection of colorectal polyps beneficial?Surgical Endoscopy, 1998
- Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open surgery for colorectal cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1998
- Colorectal cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1998
- Prospective randomized study of laparoscopicversus open colonic resection for adenocarcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1997
- Morbidity and mortality following laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1996