Unintended Consequences of Eliminating Medicare Payments for Consultations
Open Access
- 14 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Internal Medicine
- Vol. 173 (1), 15-21
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1125
Abstract
In an era of cost control, physician fees are under heavy scrutiny.1-5 The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule,6 which lists the fees that Medicare pays for each physician service under Part B of the program, contains large payment differences between primary care and specialty services. Stemming from the resource-based relative value system, these fee differences have been linked to a substantial income gap between primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists and to the shortage of medical students entering primary care.6-12 This has motivated efforts to reform physician payment toward increasing fees for primary care.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medicare Payment Reform — Proposals for Paying for an SGR RepealThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- The Central Question for Health Policy in Deficit ReductionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Health Care's Role in Deficit Reduction — Guiding PrinciplesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Physician Wages Across SpecialtiesJAMA Internal Medicine, 2010
- How Medicare’s Payment Cuts For Cancer Chemotherapy Drugs Changed Patterns Of TreatmentHealth Affairs, 2010
- The Specter of Financial Armageddon — Health Care and Federal Debt in the United StatesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Sources of U.S. Physician Income: The Contribution of Government Payments to the Specialist–Generalist Income GapJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Resource-based relative values. An overviewJAMA, 1988
- The Impact of Changing Medicare Reimbursement Rates on Physician-Induced DemandMedical Care, 1983
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980