Are acupoints specific for diseases? A systematic review of the randomized controlled trials with sham acupuncture controls
Open Access
- 12 January 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Chinese Medicine
- Vol. 5 (1), 1
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8546-5-1
Abstract
Background The results of many clinical trials and experimental studies regarding acupoint specificity are contradictory. This review aims to investigate whether a difference in efficacy exists between ordinary acupuncture on specific acupoints and sham acupuncture controls on non-acupoints or on irrelevant acupoints. Methods Databases including Medline, Embase, AMED and Chinese Biomedical Database were searched to identify randomized controlled trials published between 1998 and 2009 that compared traditional body acupuncture on acupoints with sham acupuncture controls on irrelevant acupoints or non-acupoints with the same needling depth. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was employed to address the quality of the included trials. Results Twelve acupuncture clinical trials with sham acupuncture controls were identified and included in the review. The conditions treated varied. Half of the included trials had positive results on the primary outcomes and demonstrated acupoint specificity. However, among those six trials (total sample size: 985) with low risk of bias, five trials (sample size: 940) showed no statistically significant difference between proper and sham acupuncture treatments. Conclusion This review did not demonstrate the existence of acupoint specificity. Further clinical trials with larger sample sizes, optimal acupuncture treatment protocols and appropriate sham acupuncture controls are required to resolve this important issue.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sham Acupuncture May Be as Efficacious as True Acupuncture: A Systematic Review of Clinical TrialsThe Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2009
- Minimal acupuncture is not a valid placebo control in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture: a physiologist's perspectiveChinese Medicine, 2009
- Acupuncture: What Underlies Needle Administration?Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2009
- The Status and Future of Acupuncture Clinical ResearchThe Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2008
- A Systematic Evaluation of the Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT Recommendations on Quality of Reporting for Acupuncture TrialsPLOS ONE, 2008
- Functional neuroanatomical investigation of vision‐related acupuncture point specificity—A multisession fMRI studyHuman Brain Mapping, 2007
- Acupuncture for hot flashesMenopause, 2007
- Acupuncture for Overactive BladderObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Sham interventions in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture—a reviewComplementary Therapies in Medicine, 2003
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1995