Indigenous participation in an informal national Indigenous health policy network
- 1 January 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by CSIRO Publishing in Australian Health Review
- Vol. 35 (3), 309-315
- https://doi.org/10.1071/ah09812
Abstract
Objective. To determine and describe the features of Indigenous participation in an informal national Indigenous health policy network. Design. A questionnaire was administered during 2003–04. Through a snowball nomination process a total of 227 influential persons were identified. Of these, 173 received surveys of which 44 were returned, a return rate of 25%. Outcome measures. These data were analysed to detect the existence of network groups; measure the degree of group interconnectivity; and measure the characteristics of bonds between influential persons. Demographic information was used to characterise the network and its groups. Results. Indigenous people were integral to the network due to their high representation, their distribution throughout the 16 groups, and the interconnections between the groups. The network was demographically diverse and multiple relational variables were needed to characterise it. Indigenous and non-Indigenous people had strong ties in this network. Conclusion. Social network methods made visible an informal network where Indigenous and non-Indigenous people relate in a complex socio-political environment to influence national Indigenous health policy. What is known about the topic? The participation of Indigenous people is acknowledged as important in health, but there is criticism of the lack of real opportunities for Indigenous people to participate in national Indigenous health policy processes. What does this paper add? This research reveals the presence of an informal network of influential persons. It demonstrates a way to investigate the concept of participation through social network analytic techniques. It reveals that Indigenous people are fundamental to an informal network that influences national health policy processes. What are the implications for practitioners? Practitioners can become more aware of their place in informal networks of influence and of their capacity to exercise personal influence in national policy decisions based on advice drawn from their informal networks.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of missing data in social networksSocial Networks, 2006
- Being around and knowing the players: Networks of influence in health policySocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2006
- A network approach for researching partnerships in healthAustralia and New Zealand Health Policy, 2005
- A glossary of terms for navigating the field of social network analysisJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2004
- Aboriginal society and health: critical issues demand what from sociologists?Health Sociology Review, 2001
- Governance at Ground Level: The Frontline Bureaucrat in the Age of Markets and NetworksPublic Administration Review, 1999
- Medicine, economics and agenda-settingSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 1998
- Organizing Babylon ‐ On the Different Conceptions of Policy NetworksPublic Administration, 1998
- Australian Aboriginal Policy: Aboriginal Pressure Groups or Government Advisory Bodies?Oceania, 1983
- Australian Aboriginal Policy: Aboriginal Pressure Groups or Government Advisory Bodies?Oceania, 1983