Special issue on measuring and reporting the precision of forensic likelihood ratios: Introduction to the debate
- 1 September 2016
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Science & Justice
- Vol. 56 (5), 371-373
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2016.05.002
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- A demonstration of the application of the new paradigm for the evaluation of forensic evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison caseScience & Justice, 2016
- Mismatched distances from speakers to telephone in a forensic-voice-comparison caseSpeech Communication, 2015
- The variability in likelihood ratios due to different mechanismsForensic Science International: Genetics, 2015
- An illustration of the effect of various sources of uncertainty on DNA likelihood ratio calculationsForensic Science International: Genetics, 2014
- Likelihood ratio calculation for a disputed-utterance analysis with limited available dataSpeech Communication, 2014
- Reliability of human-supervised formant-trajectory measurement for forensic voice comparisonThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2012
- The interpretation of shoeprint comparison class correspondencesScience & Justice, 2012
- Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systemsScience & Justice, 2011
- An introduction to Bayesian credible intervals for sampling error in DNA profilesLaw, Probability and Risk, 2005
- Assessing uncertainty in DNA evidence caused by sampling effectsScience & Justice, 2002