Towards mining scientific discourse using argumentation schemes
Open Access
- 16 July 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by IOS Press in Argument & Computation
- Vol. 9 (2), 121-135
- https://doi.org/10.3233/aac-180038
Abstract
The dominant approach to argument mining has been to treat it as a machine learning problem based upon superficial text features, and to treat the relationships between arguments as either support or attack. However, accurately summarizing argumentatKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- BioCause: Annotating and analysing causality in the biomedical domainBMC Bioinformatics, 2013
- A corpus of full-text journal articles is a robust evaluation tool for revealing differences in performance of biomedical natural language processing toolsBMC Bioinformatics, 2012
- Concept annotation in the CRAFT corpusBMC Bioinformatics, 2012
- Automatic recognition of conceptualization zones in scientific articles and two life science applicationsBioinformatics, 2012
- Automated extraction and semantic analysis of mutation impacts from the biomedical literatureBMC Genomics, 2012
- The biomedical discourse relation bankBMC Bioinformatics, 2011
- Argumentation miningArtificial Intelligence and Law, 2011
- Representation of Argumentation in Text with Rhetorical Structure TheoryArgumentation, 2009
- Deletion at ITPR1 Underlies Ataxia in Mice and Spinocerebellar Ataxia 15 in HumansPLoS Genetics, 2007
- MutationFinder: a high-performance system for extracting point mutation mentions from textBioinformatics, 2007