Construction of a New Growth References for China Based on Urban Chinese Children: Comparison with the WHO Growth Standards
Open Access
- 19 March 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (3), e59569
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059569
Abstract
Growth references for Chinese children should be updated due to the positive secular growth trends and the progress of the smoothing techniques. Human growth differs among the various ethnic groups, so comparison of the China references with the WHO standards helps to understand such differences. The China references, including weight, length/height, head circumference, weight-for-length/height and body mass index (BMI) aged 0–18 years, were constructed based on 69,760 urban infants and preschool children under 7 years and 24,542 urban school children aged 6–20 years derived from two cross-sectional national surveys. The Cole’s LMS method is employed for smoothing the growth curves. The merged data sets resulted in a smooth transition at age 6–7 years and continuity of curves from 0 to 18 years. Varying differences were found on the empirical standard deviation (SD) curves in each indicator at nearly all ages between China and WHO. The most noticeable differences occurred in genders, final height and boundary centiles curves. Chinese boys’ weight is strikingly heavier than that of the WHO at age 6–10 years. The height is taller than that of the WHO for boys below 15 years and for girls below 13, but is significantly lower when boys over 15 years and girls over 13. BMI is generally higher than that of the WHO for boys at age 6–16 years but appreciably lower for girls at 3–18 years. The differences between China and WHO are mainly caused by the reference populations of different ethnic backgrounds. For practitioners, the choices of the standards/references depend on the population to be assessed and the purpose of the study. The new China references could be applied to facilitate the standardization assessment of growth and nutrition for Chinese children and adolescents in clinical pediatric and public health.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Secular Trends in Prevalence and Risk Factors of Obesity in Infants and Preschool Children in 9 Chinese Cities, 1986–2006PLOS ONE, 2012
- Extended international (IOTF) body mass index cut‐offs for thinness, overweight and obesityPediatric Obesity, 2012
- BMI percentile curves for Chinese children aged 7–18 years, in comparison with the WHO and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention referencesPublic Health Nutrition, 2010
- Child body mass index in four cities of East China compared to Western referencesAnnals of Human Biology, 2008
- Comparison of the Prevalence of Shortness, Underweight, and Overweight among US Children Aged 0 to 59 Months by Using the CDC 2000 and the WHO 2006 Growth ChartsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2008
- Secular changes in stature and body mass index for Chinese youth in sixteen major cities, 1950s–2005American Journal of Human Biology, 2008
- Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescentsBulletin of the World Health Organization, 2007
- Height, health, and developmentProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1995
- Smoothing reference centile curves: The lms method and penalized likelihoodStatistics in Medicine, 1992