Hypersensitivity pneumonitis in a metal‐working environment
- 25 May 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Industrial Medicine
- Vol. 39 (6), 616-628
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.1061
Abstract
Background An outbreak of lung disease among workers in a metal‐working plant included 16 biopsy‐confirmed cases of hypersensitivity pneumonitis and additional patients with asthma, bronchiolitis and emphysema, usual interstitial pneumonitis, and sarcoidosis. Study design Clinical examination of patients; cross‐sectional questionnaire survey of the outbreak plant and two control plant areas, one with and one without MWF exposures, in a separate facility; industrial hygiene survey with laboratory characterization of microbial flora; and immunological investigation. Methods Patients with suspected hypersensitivity pneumonitis underwent a clinical examination including detailed lung function, imaging, and tissue studies. A plant walk‐through identified metal‐working processes, microbial aerosols, and work practices. Microbial characteristics of the three microbial aerosol‐producing processes were characterized. Antibodies to those agents were determined in patient sera. A questionnaire survey was conducted in the case plant and in two areas of a control plant, one with and one without metal‐working fluids exposure. Results Thirty‐nine (79.6%) patients described symptoms consistent with work‐related lung disease, eight received other diagnoses, and two did not complete their examinations. Sixteen patients had hypersensitivity pneumonitis confirmed on biopsy. Mean decrements in lung forced expiratory volume in 1 s and force vital capacity from before to after work were similar in the 16 biopsy‐confirmed cases of hypersensitivity pneumonitis ( − 6.3%; − 7.2%) and the 19 symptomatic patients without biopsies ( − 11.2%, − 10.1%). Symptoms were more common in the case plant than in a non‐MWF control plant area. Three sources of water‐based aerosols were identified that grew similar microbial flora. Although machining increased airborne bacterial levels, the increase was not related to the concentration of viable bacteria in the sumps. Antibody testing did not identify a specific single organisms. Endotoxin levels were similar in case and MWF control plant. Conclusions Lung disease in environments with water‐based aerosols may be more common than usually recognized. Patients with HP often present with only subtle abnormalities and may be missed if multiple clinical abnormalities are required to document disease. Am. J. Ind. Med. 39:616–628, 2001.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Respiratory health of automobile workers exposed to metal-working fluid aerosols: Respiratory symptomsAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1997
- Acute respiratory effects on workers exposed to metalworking fluid aerosols in an automotive transmission plantAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1997
- The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Indoor Environmental Evaluation Experience. Part Three: Associations between Environmental Factors and Self-Reported Health ConditionsApplied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 1996
- Exposure Assessment for a Field Investigation of the Acute Respiratory Effects of Metalworking Fluids. I. Summary of FindingsAihaj Journal, 1996
- Occupational exposure to metal or wood dust and aetiology of cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitisThe Lancet, 1996
- Environmental endotoxin measurement: The Kinetic Limulus Assay with Resistant-parallel-line EstimationEnvironmental Research, 1992
- Rising mortality from cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis.BMJ, 1990
- Acute pulmonary responses among automobile workers exposed to aerosols of machining fluidsAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1989
- Lipoid pneumonia caused by oil mist exposure from a steel rolling tandem millAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1981
- Normal Chest Roentgenograms in Chronic Diffuse Infiltrative Lung DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978