Comparison of Australian and international guidelines for grading severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- 1 August 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Internal Medicine Journal
- Vol. 36 (8), 506-512
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01142.x
Abstract
To compare grading of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using Australian guidelines Confirm diagnosis, Optimize function, Prevent deterioration, Develop a self-management plan and manage eXacerbations (COPD-X) versus Global initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines and to assess whether this is associated with differences in other health domains affected by COPD. Adult outpatients (n = 61) with COPD were studied using lung function measurements, six-minute walk test and body composition assessments. Subjects also completed self-rated dyspnoea scores and health-related quality-of-life scales. For each patient, COPD severity was graded using both COPD-X and GOLD guidelines, and results were collectively analysed. If significant discrepancies were observed, comparisons of other health domains were carried out. After grading severity using COPD-X and GOLD guidelines, significant discrepancies were noted. Of nine subjects with no disease (normal) based on COPD-X, seven were judged to be 'mild' according to GOLD. Similarly, 11 of 12 patients with mild disease (COPD-X) had 'moderate' disease judged by GOLD, and 9 of 23 with moderate severity (COPD-X) had 'severe' COPD using GOLD. Finally, 6 of 17 patients with COPD-X-rated severe disease had 'very severe' disease using the GOLD criteria. Among patients with COPD-X severe disease, those with GOLD discordant (very severe) severity had a poorer quality of life compared with those with GOLD concordant (severe) severity (P = 0.006). Similarly, there was also a trend towards lower six-minute walk test distance and greater subjective dyspnoea in GOLD very severe patients compared with GOLD severe patients. Significant discrepancies in grading of severity exist between Australian and international COPD guidelines. Current Australian guidelines for severity grading may not fully reflect the effect COPD has on other key domains of health.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Body composition by bioelectrical impedance predicts mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patientsRespiratory Medicine, 2005
- Both generic and disease specific health-related quality of life are deteriorated in patients with underweight COPDRespiratory Medicine, 2005
- Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: An Asia–Pacific perspectiveRespirology, 2005
- Association of Depression and Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences in Patients With COPDChest, 2005
- Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paperEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2004
- Usefulness of GOLD classification of COPD severityThorax, 2003
- Bedside methodsversusdual energy X‐ray absorptiometry for body composition measurement in COPDEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2002
- Health status measurement in chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseThorax, 2001
- Factor analysis of exercise capacity, dyspnoea ratings and lung function in patients with severe COPDEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1994
- The Measurement of DyspneaChest, 1984