Total Reconstruction, PF Movement, and Derivational Order
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in Linguistic Inquiry
- Vol. 33 (2), 283-319
- https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902317406722
Abstract
Theories of total reconstruction have generally supposed that movement can be followed by an undoing operation like LF lowering (May 1977, 1985) or deletion of higher copies (Chomsky 1993). We argue that reconstruction effects can be derived only if the original movement is purely phonological. There are no undoing operations. We present three distinct arguments, based on an interaction between raising and wh-movement in English, facts from agreement with group terms in British English, and multiple scrambling in Japanese. The arguments imply that the T-model is correct in supposing that movement that affects both LF and PF must precede movement that affects only PF.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reconstruction, Binding Theory, and the Interpretation of ChainsLinguistic Inquiry, 1999
- Why Surface Syntactic Structure Reflects Logical Structure as Much as It Does, but Only That MuchLanguage, 1999
- Two kinds of reconstructionStudia Linguistica, 1998
- Minimality, Reconstruction, and PF MovementLinguistic Inquiry, 1998
- Order in Phrase Structure and MovementLinguistic Inquiry, 1998
- Quantified structures as barriers for LF movementNatural Language Semantics, 1996
- Scrambling in Japanese, AGRoP, and Economy of derivationLingua, 1995
- Economy and scopeNatural Language Semantics, 1995
- Extraction and reconstructionNatural Language Semantics, 1995
- Negative polarity and grammatical representationLinguistics and Philosophy, 1987