Comparison of three different risk scoring systems in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
- 30 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Digestive and Liver Disease
- Vol. 36 (4), 271-277
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2003.10.017
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Utilization of health care resources for low-risk patients with acute, nonvariceal upper GI hemorrhage: An historical cohort studyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2002
- Outpatient management for low-risk nonvariceal upper GI bleeding: A randomized controlled trialGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2002
- Hospitalization for peptic ulcer bleeding: evaluation of a risk scoring system in clinical practiceDigestive and Liver Disease, 2000
- Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleedingGut, 1999
- Prospective evaluation of a clinical guideline recommending hospital length of stay in upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhageJAMA, 1997
- Selection of patients for early discharge or outpatient care after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhageThe Lancet, 1996
- Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage clinical guideline—Determining the optimal hospital length of stayAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 1996
- Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.Gut, 1996
- Prospective validation of the Baylor bleeding score for predicting the likelihood of rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis of peptic ulcersGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1995
- Outpatient care of selected patients with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhageThe Lancet, 1995